Martin Luther
stated in his preface to his commentary on Galatians, "The
Papists and Anabaptists are today agreed on this one point against
the Church of God (even if their words disguise it), namely, that
the work of God depends on the worthiness of the person." 2 Luther
explained that the Reformation was being fought on two fronts, Papists
and Anabaptists (I include the Libertines here also), but against
a common heresy: human merit that "earned" grace. The
Romanists taught the heresy of legalism, that we earn our way to
heaven, and the Anabaptists promoted license, that neither baptism
nor grace meant anything without the consent of man. And if man
consented, that was all that was necessary; the sacraments and the
life of obedience meant little. Once man had "grace,"
the way he lived was a separate issue. Thus we had these two extremes.
On the one hand, the dead sinner could make God his debtor (legalism),
and on the other hand fallen man could take part of what God offered
and leave the rest (license). The irony is that both extremes have
a common heresy: the pretended autonomy of fallen man, that the
sinner is in charge of his own salvation. Indeed, the Church through
the centuries has constantly had to sail between the Charybdis of
legalism and the Scylla of license, but on occasion it has crashed
into one or the other. The same issues confront us today. During
one of the greatest revivals in church history,
the Reformation, the Reformers brought the Church
back in line from the rampant legalism of the
late Medieval Church. In Galatians Paul stated:
"I do not set aside the grace of God; for if
righteousness comes through the law, then Christ
died in vain" (Gal. 2:21). Likewise, in
Romans 4 the same Apostle stated: "Now to
him who works, the wages are not counted as grace
but as debt. But to him who does not work but
believes on Him who justifies the ungodly, his
faith is accounted for righteousness." The
Church needed to hear that God "justifies
the ungodly" (Rom. 4:5). We needed to
be reminded that we have nothing to offer God
except our sins, and that He in return grants us
the righteousness of Christ-all as a free gift. Rome
had taught that a good work before grace was able
to obtain the grace of congruence, the giving of
grace for consideration of due merit (legalism).
The Anabaptists (Libertines3 )
especially taught that God would give grace if the will of
man first moved Him, first engaged Him, and once
grace was given, the "converted" man
could walk away from the Church. That meant he
could live an ungodly life-because he only wanted
grace for not going to hell-and he could refuse
the grace for Christian living (license). But
in re-emphasizing the Gospel, the Reformers also
reminded us that even our response to the Gospel
was God's gift to us, that before the foundation
of the world God has chosen some to be His (Acts
13:48; Eph. 1:4; 2 Tim. 1:9, etc), and that these
would respond to His grace. By this biblical
emphasis, our salvation was rightly seen to be
all of God and none of man, that justification
was by faith alone because it was by the
merits of Christ alone. To the extent that
justification was by the merits of man, it was
not by Christ alone, and thus not by faith alone.
This Reformational emphasis protected the Church
from legalism. But
with equal fervor the Reformers also balanced
justification as a free gift with the equally
biblical teaching that if one had grace, he would
have the evidence of grace: a changed life. In
the words of James, "faith without works is
dead." The one who had received grace had
all of grace (or none of it), which included
sanctifying grace, living for God. This protected
the Church from license. In
opposition to Rome, grace was free, merited for
us by Christ alone. In opposition to the
Anabaptists, grace made a difference, changed
one's life so that if one did not have the fruit
of grace it was clear that he did not have
the root of grace either. There
was another balance that the Reformers gave us,
which was the right place of the Church in our
salvation. Again there were two extremes. Rome
had taught the religion of the magic touch, which
meant that if you were touched by a priest who
had been touched by a priest who had been touched
by an Apostle, you had grace. It was automatic (ex
opere operato). But
the Reformers vehemently denied such a view of
grace while at the same time avoiding the other
extreme: that the Church was not part of God's
grace. They taught that the Church and her
sacraments were very much a part of the Gospel,
and that outside her was no salvation. Johh
Calvin had stated that we must be in ". . .
the church, into whose bosom God is pleased to
gather his sons . . . so that for those to whom
he is Father the church may also be Mother."
Again, he taught: "For there is no other way
to enter into life unless this mother conceive us
in her womb, give us birth, nourish us at her
breasts, and lastly, unless she keep us under her
care and guidance until, putting off mortal
flesh, we become like the angels." 4
Once
again, the Anabaptists went to the other extreme,
stating that the Church was all but irrelevant,
that the baptism of infants meant nothing because
the will of the infant was not yet able to
procure grace by its due exercise. One must wait
until the child was old enough to make a decision
for Christ (to use the modern language) before he
could be baptized. Once again man was put in
charge. This naturally devolved into the
complete irrelevance of the Church that we see in
modern Christianity today. Let us consider the
balance between these two extremes Rome taught that there was absolutely
no salvation outside membership in her and by her touch, which grace
was merited by the sinner (legalism). The Anabaptists taught that
the Church did not matter (license). The Reformers, however, proclaimed
salvation in the Church but not necessarily as automatic; it was
through the means of grace in the Church (balance) and received
by faith. Rome saw salvation as corporate only (legalism), the Anabaptists
as individual only (license), and the Reformers as both corporate
and individual (balance). With Rome the sacraments were everything
(legalism); with the Anabaptists they were nothing (license); and
with the Reformers they were means of grace (balance). Today
we have need of another Reformation, but this
time it is to reestablish the Protestant Church that
has become affected by heresies, legalism,
and given to license. (The Roman Church still
needs to be reformed as well.) Some groups do not
profess the Gospel at all. Others do not even
believe the Apostles' Creed, denying the deity
and/or humanity of Christ (see article in this
issue entitled "Crisis Regarding Christ").
The churches that deny this are apostate. Many
are legalistic in that they look to human
elements for their salvation, such as walking an
aisle or other additions to the Gospel. Extra-biblical
rules (hair length, rules on alcohol, etc) govern
the Church more than His commandments. Indeed,
His commandments are often said to be for some
other age, not for today! It has become our laws,
not His. Some
are given to license in that many Protestant
churches do not believe in the Lordship of Christ.
Indeed, one large "evangelical"
seminary has made it a matter of faith that one
can have Christ as Savior without having Him as
Lord! In many Protestant circles, the Anabaptists
have won the day. The Church is relegated to the
irrelevant while we constantly hear individuals
say, "I don't have to go to church to be a
Christian." This is license with a vengeance.
Christ's Lordship in His Church takes a back seat
to the individual who sovereignly decides what
part of salvation and the Church he will take.
Claims are made to belong to the "invisible"
Church even though one may not belong to His
visible Church, which is totally contrary to the
Reformation and to Holy Scripture. Maybe he will
take baptism, and maybe he will take Holy
Communion; but then, maybe not. One can still be
a member in good standing of many Protestant
churches without these means of grace! I know of
churches, even elders, who have never been
baptized! After thirty years of ministry in
Protestant churches, the most difficult battle
has been getting people to see the importance of
the Church. They have resisted the error of
legalism quite well, but they have fallen
headlong into license, thinking that the Church
is a smorgasbord, take what you want and leave
the rest. The individual is in charge. One former
parishioner challenged me to show him in the
Bible where it said that he had to come to church
on time (he was habitually 30 to 40 minutes late!).
He was in charge, and he would take however much
of the Holy Communion service that he thought
best! But
let us proclaim the old grace of the Gospel that
lifts up the divine Son of God, who gave Himself
for our sins that we might be justified by grace
alone through faith alone in Jesus alone, thereby
avoiding legalism. Let us with equal insistence
expound that the same grace that grants us
entrance into God's Church also enables us to
make progress in the Christian life, to attend
His worship, to use the means of grace through
His sacraments, and to be submissive to Him by
being submissive to His ordained clergy. Let us
say with Paul, "For by grace you have been
saved through faith, and that not of yourselves;
it is the gift of God, not of works, lest anyone
should boast" (Eph. 2:8-9). But let us also
agree with Paul's next verse: "For we
are His workmanship, created in Christ Jesus for
good works, which God prepared beforehand
that we should walk in them" (Eph. 2:10).
The same grace that saves us from the penalty of
sin also saves us from the power of sin,
and both always in the context of His visible
Church. 1 This article may be
distributed as long as it is not sold and no
changes are made. 2 Martin Luther, A Commentary
on St. Paul's Epistle to the Galatians, 1535
(Published by James Clarke & Co. Ltd, 1973),
p. 18. 3 John Calvin, Treatises
Against the Anabaptists and Against the
Libertines (Grand Rapids: Baker Book House,
1982), p. 262ff. 4 John Calvin, Institutes of
the Christian Religion, 4.1.1, 4. We could
also quote the later Westminster Confession of
Faith, 25.2 of the Presbyterians, or the earlier
Article XIX of the Thirty-Nine Articles of
Religion of the Anglicans. |